Tuesday, February 2, 2010


Posted by Picasa


  1. Yes, he is a classic Michael Rivers guy -- with a line stretching, may I add, a goodly distance to the rear. But I've been wond'ring on the sulk of the remaining two -- and what remnants their countenances do make of them, quite wrongly, I could say. I like them all, and don't mind in the slightest the burden of allowing them to feel they are a Michael Rivers kind of guy. :)


All comments are screened and moderated.